Undeprecate reject_phishing

This commit is contained in:
SukkaW 2025-04-19 21:18:46 +08:00
parent 25f79585ed
commit faa0953dbf
2 changed files with 34 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ import fsp from 'node:fs/promises';
const DEPRECATED_FILES = [ const DEPRECATED_FILES = [
['non_ip/global_plus', 'This file has been merged with non_ip/global'], ['non_ip/global_plus', 'This file has been merged with non_ip/global'],
['domainset/reject_sukka', 'This file has been merged with domainset/reject'], ['domainset/reject_sukka', 'This file has been merged with domainset/reject']
['domainset/reject_phishing', 'This file has been merged with domainset/reject']
]; ];
const REMOVED_FILES = [ const REMOVED_FILES = [

View File

@ -6,20 +6,20 @@ import { processHostsWithPreload } from './lib/parse-filter/hosts';
import { processDomainListsWithPreload } from './lib/parse-filter/domainlists'; import { processDomainListsWithPreload } from './lib/parse-filter/domainlists';
import { processFilterRulesWithPreload } from './lib/parse-filter/filters'; import { processFilterRulesWithPreload } from './lib/parse-filter/filters';
import { HOSTS, ADGUARD_FILTERS, PREDEFINED_WHITELIST, DOMAIN_LISTS, HOSTS_EXTRA, DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA, ADGUARD_FILTERS_EXTRA, ADGUARD_FILTERS_WHITELIST } from './constants/reject-data-source'; import { HOSTS, ADGUARD_FILTERS, PREDEFINED_WHITELIST, DOMAIN_LISTS, HOSTS_EXTRA, DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA, ADGUARD_FILTERS_EXTRA, ADGUARD_FILTERS_WHITELIST, PHISHING_HOSTS_EXTRA, PHISHING_DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA } from './constants/reject-data-source';
import { readFileIntoProcessedArray } from './lib/fetch-text-by-line'; import { readFileIntoProcessedArray } from './lib/fetch-text-by-line';
import { task } from './trace'; import { task } from './trace';
// tldts-experimental is way faster than tldts, but very little bit inaccurate // tldts-experimental is way faster than tldts, but very little bit inaccurate
// (since it is hashes based). But the result is still deterministic, which is // (since it is hashes based). But the result is still deterministic, which is
// enough when creating a simple stat of reject hosts. // enough when creating a simple stat of reject hosts.
import { SHARED_DESCRIPTION } from './constants/description'; import { SHARED_DESCRIPTION } from './constants/description';
import { getPhishingDomains } from './lib/get-phishing-domains';
import { addArrayElementsToSet } from 'foxts/add-array-elements-to-set'; import { addArrayElementsToSet } from 'foxts/add-array-elements-to-set';
import { OUTPUT_INTERNAL_DIR, SOURCE_DIR } from './constants/dir'; import { OUTPUT_INTERNAL_DIR, SOURCE_DIR } from './constants/dir';
import { DomainsetOutput } from './lib/rules/domainset'; import { DomainsetOutput } from './lib/rules/domainset';
import { foundDebugDomain } from './lib/parse-filter/shared'; import { foundDebugDomain } from './lib/parse-filter/shared';
import { AdGuardHomeOutput } from './lib/rules/domainset'; import { AdGuardHomeOutput } from './lib/rules/domainset';
import { getPhishingDomains } from './lib/get-phishing-domains';
const readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise = readFileIntoProcessedArray(path.join(SOURCE_DIR, 'domainset/reject.conf')); const readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise = readFileIntoProcessedArray(path.join(SOURCE_DIR, 'domainset/reject.conf'));
const readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise = readFileIntoProcessedArray(path.join(SOURCE_DIR, 'domainset/reject_extra.conf')); const readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise = readFileIntoProcessedArray(path.join(SOURCE_DIR, 'domainset/reject_extra.conf'));
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
const rejectBaseDescription = [ const rejectBaseDescription = [
...SHARED_DESCRIPTION, ...SHARED_DESCRIPTION,
'', '',
'The domainset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-phishing, anti-mining', 'The domainset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-mining',
'', '',
'Build from:', 'Build from:',
...HOSTS.map(host => ` - ${host[0]}`), ...HOSTS.map(host => ` - ${host[0]}`),
@ -57,12 +57,24 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
.withDescription([ .withDescription([
...SHARED_DESCRIPTION, ...SHARED_DESCRIPTION,
'', '',
'The domainset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-phishing, anti-mining', 'The domainset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-mining',
'', '',
'Build from:', 'Build from:',
...HOSTS_EXTRA.map(host => ` - ${host[0]}`), ...HOSTS_EXTRA.map(host => ` - ${host[0]}`),
...DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA.map(domainList => ` - ${domainList[0]}`), ...DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA.map(domainList => ` - ${domainList[0]}`),
...ADGUARD_FILTERS_EXTRA.map(filter => ` - ${Array.isArray(filter) ? filter[0] : filter}`) ...ADGUARD_FILTERS_EXTRA.map(filter => ` - ${filter[0]}`)
]);
const rejectPhisingOutput = new DomainsetOutput(span, 'reject_phishing')
.withTitle('Sukka\'s Ruleset - Reject Phishing')
.withDescription([
...SHARED_DESCRIPTION,
'',
'The domainset is specifically designed for anti-phishing',
'',
'Build from:',
...PHISHING_HOSTS_EXTRA.map(host => ` - ${host[0]}`),
...PHISHING_DOMAIN_LISTS_EXTRA.map(domainList => ` - ${domainList[0]}`)
]); ]);
const appendArrayToRejectOutput = rejectOutput.addFromDomainset.bind(rejectOutput); const appendArrayToRejectOutput = rejectOutput.addFromDomainset.bind(rejectOutput);
@ -81,9 +93,12 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
// It is faster to add base than add others first then whitelist // It is faster to add base than add others first then whitelist
rejectOutput.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectRulesetPromise), rejectOutput.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectRulesetPromise),
rejectExtraOutput.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectRulesetPromise), rejectExtraOutput.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectRulesetPromise),
readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise.then(appendArrayToRejectOutput),
readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise.then(appendArrayToRejectExtraOutput), rejectOutput.addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise),
readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise.then(appendArrayToRejectExtraOutput), rejectExtraOutput.addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise),
rejectPhisingOutput.addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectDomainsetPromise),
rejectExtraOutput.addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise),
// Parse from remote hosts & domain lists // Parse from remote hosts & domain lists
hostsDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectOutput)), hostsDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectOutput)),
@ -92,6 +107,8 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
domainListsDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectOutput)), domainListsDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectOutput)),
domainListsExtraDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectExtraOutput)), domainListsExtraDownloads.map(task => task(childSpan).then(appendArrayToRejectExtraOutput)),
rejectPhisingOutput.addFromDomainset(getPhishingDomains(childSpan)),
adguardFiltersDownloads.map( adguardFiltersDownloads.map(
task => task(childSpan).then(({ whiteDomains, whiteDomainSuffixes, blackDomains, blackDomainSuffixes }) => { task => task(childSpan).then(({ whiteDomains, whiteDomainSuffixes, blackDomains, blackDomainSuffixes }) => {
addArrayElementsToSet(filterRuleWhitelistDomainSets, whiteDomains); addArrayElementsToSet(filterRuleWhitelistDomainSets, whiteDomains);
@ -127,7 +144,8 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
await Promise.all([ await Promise.all([
rejectOutput.done(), rejectOutput.done(),
rejectExtraOutput.done() rejectExtraOutput.done(),
rejectPhisingOutput.done()
]); ]);
// whitelist // whitelist
@ -135,14 +153,17 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
for (const domain of filterRuleWhitelistDomainSets) { for (const domain of filterRuleWhitelistDomainSets) {
rejectOutput.whitelistDomain(domain); rejectOutput.whitelistDomain(domain);
rejectExtraOutput.whitelistDomain(domain); rejectExtraOutput.whitelistDomain(domain);
rejectPhisingOutput.whitelistDomain(domain);
} }
rejectOutput.domainTrie.dump(rejectExtraOutput.whitelistDomain.bind(rejectExtraOutput)); rejectOutput.domainTrie.dump(rejectExtraOutput.whitelistDomain.bind(rejectExtraOutput));
rejectOutput.domainTrie.dump(rejectPhisingOutput.whitelistDomain.bind(rejectPhisingOutput));
}); });
await Promise.all([ await Promise.all([
rejectOutput.write(), rejectOutput.write(),
rejectExtraOutput.write() rejectExtraOutput.write(),
rejectPhisingOutput.write()
]); ]);
// we are going to re-use rejectOutput's domainTrie and mutate it // we are going to re-use rejectOutput's domainTrie and mutate it
@ -150,7 +171,7 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
const rejectOutputAdGuardHome = new AdGuardHomeOutput(span, 'reject-adguardhome', OUTPUT_INTERNAL_DIR) const rejectOutputAdGuardHome = new AdGuardHomeOutput(span, 'reject-adguardhome', OUTPUT_INTERNAL_DIR)
.withTitle('Sukka\'s Ruleset - Blocklist for AdGuardHome') .withTitle('Sukka\'s Ruleset - Blocklist for AdGuardHome')
.withDescription([ .withDescription([
'The AdGuardHome ruleset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-phishing, anti-mining' 'The AdGuardHome ruleset supports AD blocking, tracking protection, privacy protection, anti-mining'
]); ]);
rejectOutputAdGuardHome.domainTrie = rejectOutput.domainTrie; rejectOutputAdGuardHome.domainTrie = rejectOutput.domainTrie;
@ -161,6 +182,6 @@ export const buildRejectDomainSet = task(require.main === module, __filename)(as
.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectDropRulesetPromise) .addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectDropRulesetPromise)
.addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectNoDropRulesetPromise) .addFromRuleset(readLocalRejectNoDropRulesetPromise)
.addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise) .addFromDomainset(readLocalRejectExtraDomainsetPromise)
.addFromDomainset(getPhishingDomains(span)) // .
.write(); .write();
}); });